COVER STORY
defence dud deals
Toys they force you to buy
Logic
in the world of bullets, bombs and ballistics dictates that China is
the most populous, Gulf is overflowing with petrodollars, Israel or Iran
have the utmost threat, conventional wars may never happen. Still why
is India buying so many weapons – to be the world’s largest weapons
importer and fourth-largest defence spender by 2020 ahead of France,
Japan and UK. Is India really under so much threat or is it because few
individuals and countries make money in every deal? Buying the most
expensive or sophisticated arsenal is not end of the problem but the
beginning of a new arms race.
by Neeraj Mahajan & Anil Tyagi
Money
is everything and there is no patriotism, ethics, morality, sanctity of
borders or qualms about supplying arms to army or mercenaries—in the
business of weapons and missiles. The huge and unending demand from
Army, police and terrorists who are the biggest consumers – makes arms a
recession-proof industry. Armed forces spend over $1,000 billion
annually to purchase or upgrade military hardware and consumables. A
thin veil divides the legal and illegal business of arms. There are no
separate factories, channels of supply might be different but products
are the same. An AK 47 in the hands of Police or militants might
originate from the same factory.
The
$1.465 Trillion global arms industry is largely unregulated and
controlled by —USA, UK, France, Russia, and China and some 35 less
significant weapon producing countries. As the only five permanent
members of UN Security Council – the big six sanction all make war and
peace and pocket 90 per cent of profits from the arms exports. It is an
industry, where effectiveness of a product is decided by the number of
people it can kill, where death and destruction is celebrated as
victory. French investigators probing the charges of bribery against
former President Nicolas Sarkozy in the ‘Karachi Affair’ involving the
sale of French submarines to Pakistan and frigates to Saudi Arabia
discovered that the 11 French naval engineers were killed in the Karachi
bomb blast allegedly triggered by Pakistan’s ISI to seek revenge
because bribes secretly promised to them were not paid...Read More
Abhishek
Dale
Hailed
A
wealthy Syrian, Monzer Al Kassar is one of the world’s most prolific
arms dealers, who the United Nations say is an ‘international embargo
buster’. On one side, he owns an import-export company that conducts
legitimate business while on the other, he is known as a notorious...
The
This 



Why
indira
B
the 
Mamata
Union
Union
Chief
BHARATIYA
Janata Party President Rajnath Singh knows how to remain grounded even
though he has a pan-India presence now. The ambitious thakur from Uttar
Pradesh knows well that without winning his seat in the Lok Sabha
election, his dream of becoming the Prime Minister will fizzle out like
that of N D Tiwari. Rajnath is an MP from Ghaziabad; he won the last
election with the help of Jat leader Ajit Singh. Now Ajit Singh is an
ally of the Congress Party and the Civil Aviation Minister in the Union
Cabinet. This queered the pitch for Rajnath and he was finding it
difficult to resolve this situation. But a godsend opportunity came his
way from Bihar. A Rajya Sabha seat was vacated by Upendra Kushwaha.
Rajnath grabbed the opportunity and lobbied with BJP Bihar unit for
nominating K C Tyagi, leftist-turned-centrist politician of Western UP
and known as KC. On the other side, Sharad Yadav – a long time associate
of Tyagi – spoke to Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and the wily
Laloo Yadav. Sharad requested Laloo not to spoil the game as KC is an
old friend of both since the days of Karpoori Thakur and Devi Lal. As a
result, KC finally entered Parliament again as Rajya Sabha member after
22 years of long wait. With the induction of KC in RS, beleaguered
Rajnath ensured an important section of his constituency to be on his
side. Now he is aiming to get the support of a Jat leader in Parliament.
For this, he has assured one Jat leader from Western UP that he will
fulfill his promise soon. The question now is, will these manipulations
lead to the desired result of a win from a Jat and Tyagi-dominated
Ghaziabad constituency? Only time will tell!
P
K Misra, Secretary in the Department of Personnel and Training, is
considered to be an efficient officer. But, he is either over-worked or
has become travel weary. For if this was not the case, the North Block
would not have made West Bengal cadre IAS officer Hem Kumar Pande an
Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Environment and Forests. As per
the note appointing him to this post, Pande is 10 years junior to his
batch-mates. And, this note was even sent to the Principal Secretary to
the Prime Minister, Pulok Chatterji, Environment Secretary, V
Rajagopalan, and Joint Secretary in the Cabinet Secretariat, Nivedita
Shukla Verma. The order appointing Pande as Additional Secretary was
signed by the Joint Secretary and it showed him to be a 1992 batch
officer whereas he actually is of the 1982 batch. The order, dated
January 28, 2013, from the Department of Personnel states that the 1990
batch IAS cadre officer from Assam Meghalaya, Ravi Shankar Prasad, will
replace Pande as Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Environment and
Forests. It goes on to say that Hem Kumar Pande (IAS, WB, 1992) will be
Additional Secretary in the Ministry. Had common sense prevailed,
officials in the DoPT would have realised that no 1992 batch IAS officer
is eligible for appointment as an Additional Secretary!
Secretaries
in the Defence Ministry are supposed to ensure that Ministers don’t
take arbitrary decisions and endanger the defence of the country. They
are the watchdogs. They should be able to speak their mind. But when
they choose to close their eyes and ears, it’s an invitation to all
kinds of scams, deals and controversies. It is, therefore, not
surprising that in all these years of scams and scandals, while
ministers have lost their jobs, not one defence secretary appears to
have put his foot down or dared to disagree with his political master.
Is this because they are reaping the fruits of their silence after
retirement? One beneficiary of this quid pro-quo deal appears to
have been Shekhar Dutt, a 1969 batch IAS officer from Madhya Pradesh and
brother-in-law of Pulok Chatterjee. Shortly after his retirement as
Defence Secretary, he was appointed as Governor of Chhattisgarh.
Similarly, NN Vohra took over as I K Gujral’s principal secretary and
headed a committee, which submitted a report on the links between
criminals and politicians to P V Narasimha Rao. He is now Governor of
J&K. Another former Defence Secretary, P M Nair, a 1967 batch IAS
officer, was appointed Secretary to the President while Vijay Singh is
currently a member of the UPSC. Again, Pradeep Kumar, a 1972 batch
officer of the Haryana cadre, was appointed CVC after his retirement. He
had been promoted as Defence Secretary just two months before his
retirement from Secretary (Defence Production). The promotion pushed his
retirement to July 30, 2011. Again, he was chosen as the CVC just a
month before he was due to retire, a post that will now allow him to
continue in office till the age of 65. He will now retire on September
29, 2014. Interestingly the strongest contenders for the 12th CAG’s post
are two former Defence Secretaries – Shashi Kant Sharma and R K Singh.
Defence
Research and Development Organisation chief VK Saraswat is an unhappy
man, with the Defence Ministry clipping his wings. They say uneasy lies
the head that wears the crown. So when you wear three crowns you have to
be really careful. This is something Saraswat should have known.
Wearing three hats – Director General of DRDO; Secretary, Defence
Research and Development; and Chief Scientific Advisor to the Defence
Minister – Saraswat entrusted himself with certain financial powers. He
used his good offices to persuade the Government to enhance the
financial powers of DRDO Director General and Secretary, Defence
Research and Development from Rs 25-50 crore and Rs 60-75 crore,
respectively. To create a facade of accountability, while sanctioning a
project up to Rs 50 crore as DG DRDO, he would get the concurrence of
his financial advisor on the file. This was even though the financial
advisor was reporting to him. When these ‘deficiencies’, ‘procedural
irregularities’ and ‘splitting sanctions’ came to light, Saraswat found
that he had more enemies than friends in the Defence Ministry. Thus, the
CAG noted that the manner in which costs were being artificially
reduced to below the Rs 50-crore mark was particularly objectionable.
Apparently, this was being done by reducing the number of deliverables
and curtailing the project scope. In many cases, expenditure heads for
scientists and manpower were not included. For instance, the actual cost
of a Rs 70 crore project for design and development of electro-optical
sensors for air-borne platforms was manipulated and split in such a way
that both remained well under Rs 50 crore. Likewise projects Akashdeep
and Aditya were so tailored that there was no need to get higher
sanction. There were also irregularities relating to nomenclature of
sanction issuing authorities, database and splitting of sanctions. Now
the very people who were supporting him are gunning for him.