MANDARIN MATTERS
nepal krishna v. rajan
Darkness at Noon
In the late 1990s, India’s twin strategy of supporting
multi-party democracy and constitutional monarchy in Nepal was working
well – or so it seemed!
There
was clearly some preoccupation in New Delhi to repair the relationship
with the monarchy, after the tensions generated by the standoff of
1980-90. Birendra was supposed to be only a constitutional monarch, but
was still a highly important element in the Nepalese polity. Prime
Minister Narasimha Rao felt that the king could make a constructive
contribution to a more mature relationship with India just as the king
of Bhutan had, and wanted India’s links with the monarchy to be made
firmer even as it sought to strengthen Nepal’s democracy: what came to
be known as the ‘twin-pillar approach’.
But
the role of the monarchy needed clarification. In my first audience with
him, I found King Birendra to be affable, mild-mannered, soft-spoken
and relaxed. An immediate outcome of this first meeting was Birendra’s
decision to give a public signal of normal relations with India by
agreeing to spend an evening at India House with his immediate family –
after decades of a chill in such social-level contacts. The royal
family, along with the entire political and civil society elite of
Nepal, attended a concert on the lawns of India House by Ustad Amjad Ali
Khan and his sons Amaan and Ayaan. It was quite an ambience: setting
sun, tall pine trees, the birds singing as if on cue with the
soul-stirring strumming of the sarod.Read More
No comments:
Post a Comment