Department
of Personnel and Training (DoPT) Secretary Sanjay Kothari wants to
improve the skills of the top civil servants so DoPT has constituted a
board of National Facilitators who will run different training
programmes for officers. The facilitators on board are former Coal
Secretary SK Shrivastava, former Agriculture Secretary Anup Kumar
Thakur, National Shipping Board Chairman Vishwapati Trivedi and former
retired Urban Development Secretaries Sudhir Krishna and Upendra Nath
Bora. This high-powered group has planned “high quality” training
modules in association with the United Nations Development Programme.
The programme will start with the screening of Sydney Lumet’s 1957
classic, 12 Angry Men, to sharpen the leadership skills of top
bureaucrats, emphasising ethics and values through this film. It offers
lessons on building consensus among persons with different personalities
from different backgrounds. The focus will be on bureaucrats
“comprehending the power of influence in the functioning of leadership,
relating to the traits and behaviours associated with leadership and
dealing with multiple stakeholders in a complex and multicultural
environment”. The UNDP has prepared the two-day module on leadership at
the request of the DoPT. “The entire programme will have the following
ethos interspersing all sessions — accountability,
creativity/possibility thinking, going within, positivity, positive
vision and inspiring goals, actions: What is mine to do?” as per the
course module. Leading a stress-free as well as a “wholesome life in all
dimensions” will also be a part of the ‘Ethics and Values’ module. The
film 12 Angry Men (in 1986, Indian director Basu Chatterjee remade it as Ek Ruka Hua Faisla)
is the story of how 12 jurors are asked to reach a unanimous decision
on whether a person is guilty or not, with the accused set to receive a
death sentence if the jury finds him guilty. The film shows how a lone
juror who had doubts about the evidence manages to win over his 11
colleagues. g
March 9, 2016
Under Modi’s watch
Two
important resource-rich public sector undertakings are on the radar of
the government–the National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC) and
the Directorate-General of Hydrocarbons (DGH). The NMDC is idle without a
permanent chairman, though Gopal Singh was selected by the Public
Enterprises Selection Board (PESB) in July 2015 but there was no
initiative from the Prime Minister’s Office to clear his name. At the
same time, there were also rumours about the clandestine manner in which
he was selected. Sources disclosed that the PMO’s silence is possibly
because it was aware about the modus operandi of the then PESB
chairman. It is now learnt that the Ministry of Steel has scrapped the
selection panel and a search committee has been constituted to select a
new and competent candidate. Meanwhile in the DGH, the post of DG was
vacant for a long time. Finally, Atanu Chakraborty, a 1985-batch IAS
officer of the Gujarat cadre, has been appointed. He is at present
working as Managing Director of the Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation
Ltd. Chakraborty has served in the districts of Vadodara, Sabarkantha
and was Collector of Amreli district. In Gandhinagar, he has served in
the Finance, Home, Tribal Development and Labour Departments. He has
also worked as Principal Secretary (Economic Affairs), Finance
Department, Gujarat. Modi is clearly selecting the heads of PSUs very
carefully. g
Read more...
Read more...
Now for some real news
Supriya
Sahu, IAS, has been recommended by the Prasar Bharati Board as the next
DG Doordarshan. She will take charge after approval from the ACC. But
in the meantime, there seems to be a lot of talk over her selection for
the coveted job in the nearly dead organisation. A large chunk of
professionals refuse to accept her credentials as fit to lead a huge
force of techno-programme cadre. The Chairman of the Board too was heard
to be fuming over the coup. He even had a showdown with the CEO.
Sources reveal that to bring Doordarshan back on rails, he was set to
promote a professional culture by inducting internal candidates. It is
also learnt that he had sounded both the Ministers, who gave a nod to
his scheme of things. In such a situation, the unexpected somersault in
the guise of Sahu’s appointment has raised many an eyebrow. The haste to
push the case of the lady officer as the lone candidate is also being
frowned upon. Is a group of bureaucrats apprehending inconvenient times
ahead, behind this move? Are these bureaucrats trying to hide something
that is already known to others!g
The cost factor
Transport
Ministry officials are said to be in a tizzy about what the surface of
roads in India should be like. This situation has come about because the
construction business is in recessionary mode. The cement industry,
particularly, is facing a crunch because of low demand. So, members of
the Manufacturers of Cement Association (MCA) met the Minister for Road
Transport, Highways and Shipping, Nitin Gadkari, and requested him to
use a cement component in laying highways. Gadkari patiently listened to
them and then suggested they should meet National Highway Authority of
India (NHAI) Chairman Raghav Chandra. Currently, we learn, NHAI
officials are conducting a cost-benefit analysis. But everyone knows
there are two methods to construct a road: One, flexible pavement, which
consists of various layers of granular material with a layer of
bituminous materials on top. The other is rigid pavement, which consists
of cement concrete pavements laid on a well-prepared granular sub-base.
With the international prices of bituminous materials slumping by 25
per cent in February, the rigid pavement method is obviously more
costly. In addition, rigid pavements exert more wear and tear impact on
vehicles. In these circumstances, NHAI officials are keeping a discrete
silence as they don’t know what the Ministry would like. MCA leaders
are, meanwhile, knocking on the doors of NHAI, but there appears to be
no light on the road. g
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)